Volume ratings were distributed uniformly along side size (Fig
Frequency
2A). Given that instances, STETHOSCOPE (Yards = 1.333), EMPEROR (M = 1.407), and you can Palace (Yards = 1.579) were ranked one of the least repeated signs during the ASL-LEX, and you can Drinking water (Yards = six.963), Your (Yards = 6.889), and you may Me personally (M = 6.76) was in fact ranked one of the most frequent signs.
We conducted a comparison of subjective frequency estimates from ASL-LEX and another independent dataset that used the same 1–7 rating scale for ASL signs, although the ratings were from deaf ASL signers residing in Canada (). We verified that a total of 297 items shared the same sign form in both datasets. The raw frequency ratings in the two datasets were moderately correlated (r s = 0.65, p < .001), suggesting good external validity. We also conducted a cross-linguistic comparison between raw subjective frequency estimates for a subset of 226 ASL and BSL signs from Vinson et al. (2008) that had translation equivalents in English (same rating scale). The results revealed a moderate correlation (r s = 0.52, p < .001), suggesting that signs expressing similar concepts in two different sign languages (evidenced by the same English translation) tend to receive similar frequency estimates. Using Fisher's r-to-z transformation, we found that the ASL-ASL correlation was stronger than the ASL-BSL correlation (z = 2.24, p = 0.0251). In addition, raw frequency ratings were moderately correlated with log10 word frequencies of their English translations from SUBTLEXAll of us (r s = 0.58, p < .001). The ASL-ASL correlation did not statistically differ from the ASL-English correlation (z = 1.69, p = 0.091).
Interestingly, Bates ainsi que al. (2003) discovered similar lexical volume correlations certainly 7 verbal dialects (Mean roentgen = .51; SD = .079), despite typologically varied dialects particularly English and you will Mandarin Chinese (roentgen = .53). Bates ainsi que al. (2003) hypothesize the relatively large surface of analysis around the languages could possibly get be related to shared social experience. This would be a probably cause on finding that in this an identical words and you will/otherwise people (ASL-ASL; ASL-English), this new relationship was more powerful than across languages and you may cultures (ASL-BSL). There may be maxims which can be so much more culturally connected to deaf organizations and their verbal competitors during the The united states than in the brand new United kingdom, and this you can expect to dictate the fresh volume in which specific terminology/signs are used in the for each code, including participants’ knowledge of the fresh new maxims on their own.
Iconicity
Iconicity critiques have been skewed for the lower end of the size (Fig. 2B), demonstrating you to definitely cues found in ASL-LEX was basically basically thought to enjoys reduced iconicity viewpoints. While we selected new cues into aim of gaining an effective normal volume shipments, contra Vinson ainsi que al. (2008) we failed to select cues with an objective iconicity distribution (we.elizabeth., specifically looking for cues within one another ends up of your own iconicity delivery). The results thus imply that lexicalized ASL signs is regarding reduced iconicity when volume might be delivered. Publication (Mean Iconicity = six.684) and you may ZIPPER (Yards = six.394) are among the very legendary cues inside ASL-LEX, and you can Yesterday (M = 1.086) and you will Lazy (M = step 1.567) are among the the very least legendary signs.
Phonological functions
The fresh new distribution off phonological properties can be seen for the Fig. step three. This new “neutral” slight area is the absolute most regular (Letter = 345), the next four common places was basically palm (N = 92), other Footnote cuatro (Letter = 76), chin (N = 60) and you will vision (Letter = 60). The remainder twenty-eight lesser locations was depicted because of the fifty otherwise a lot fewer signs. The prices off small urban centers come in an important.csv file during the OSF (
Regularity shipments from phonological functions when you look at the ASL-LEX. To own chose fingers, meters = middle digit, roentgen = ring finger, p = pinky, we = index thumb. To own Sign Sort of, HS = handshape