Wherefore: -Judgment was rendered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants -TCTs No

Wherefore: -Judgment was rendered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants -TCTs No Wherein: -Both Plaintiff and Defendants are claiming a parcel of land in Quezon City (North Fairview if I remember correctly), each backed with different certificates of title -The Defendants’ TCTs are proven to be in derogation of Act 496 and PD 1529 as corresponding Decree Nos. shows land registration cases in other provinces -The Plaintiff’s claim is proven supported by both testimonial and documentary evidence You may wonder how such case is relevant to what we have been discussing SC Rulings mentioned: -Pilar Dev’t Corp vs Court of Appeals reiterated its ruling in Stilianopulos vs The City of Legaspi re: evidence or set of facts used in a...

Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Linkedin